top of page

The Geopolitical Chessboard: Analyzing Beijing's WAICO Push and the New Global AI Order

  • Writer: Shrikant Soman
    Shrikant Soman
  • Nov 12
  • 6 min read

ree

The Geopolitical Chessboard: Analyzing Beijing's WAICO Push and the New Global AI Order

The initiative by China to establish the World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization (WAICO) is a critical geopolitical move. It is Beijing's strategic bid to establish algorithmic multilateralism under its leadership, challenging the current Western-dominated tech governance landscape and positioning China as the principal architect of the rules, standards, and norms for future AI development.

WAICO is a major geopolitical move by China to position itself as the principal architect of the rules, standards, and norms that will govern the future of Artificial Intelligence worldwide.

1. WAICO: China's Bid for Digital Rule-Making

WAICO is an institutional initiative signaling a transition in Beijing's strategy from being a rule-taker to a rule-maker in the global technology order.

  • Proposed Headquarters: Shanghai, China. This centralization is strategic, aiming to host both the "rulebook" and the "referee" for the AI age, similar to how the West housed institutions like the IMF post-WWII.

  • Stated Objectives: WAICO promises to establish a platform for technology sharing, capacity building, and creating an Algorithmic Compensation Fund financed by AI revenues. These ideas are highly appealing to the Global South.

  • Design and Intent: While presented as multilateral, the design is functionally China-centric. The strategic intent is to align global standards on data, privacy, and surveillance norms with Chinese interests, thereby gaining a significant soft power advantage in digital trade and regulation.

The strategy of India is one of strategic engagement without blind endorsement.

2. The Appeal to the Global South

The WAICO initiative gains significant traction by actively addressing the concerns of developing nations, which often feel excluded or subjected to technological dependencies created by Western tech giants.

  • Bridging the Digital Divide: WAICO promises access to AI, funding, and training, appealing directly to nations that lack foundational computing infrastructure and resources.

  • Countering Techno-Nationalism: It offers an alternative to restrictive regulatory frameworks (like the EU's AI Act) and export controls (like the U.S. CHIPS Act), which can be seen as prohibitive by developing nations.

  • Sovereignty and Development: The initiative often frames its approach around respecting data sovereignty and prioritizing AI for development and sustainable growth.

India’s DPI approach is a robust, democratic alternative designed to balance innovation with accountability and promote 'AI for All.'

3. India's Strategic Dilemma: Engagement vs. Vigilance

For a major technology power like India, the WAICO push presents both an opportunity and a risk. India's strategy is one of strategic engagement without blind endorsement.

A. The Opportunities (Why India Should Engage):

  • Access: To influence standard-setting and prevent exclusion from critical AI resource pools (compute power, cloud services, data).

  • Voice: To ensure Global South perspectives on ethical AI, fairness, and affordability are included in the new framework.

  • Leverage: Participation in diverse forums (WAICO, GPAI, UN) maximizes India's diplomatic influence in the emerging AI order.

The competition to set these AI standards is the new frontier of geopolitical power.

B. The Risks (Why India Must Be Vigilant):

  • Data Sovereignty: WAICO could compromise India's principles of data autonomy and open-source development.

  • Digital Dependency: Norms set by a China-led body could create digital dependencies that favour Chinese industrial policy and market capture.

  • Undercutting UN Efforts: WAICO risks creating a parallel, China-led track that undermines broader, UN-based global AI governance frameworks.


Syed Akbaruddin (Former Permanent Representative of India to the UN) "When finance was globalised and trade liberalised, the West wrote the rules at Bretton Woods... Now, Beijing seeks both the rulebook and the referee under its roof." Context: This quote perfectly frames WAICO as a Chinese-led institution seeking global digital dominance, akin to the post-WWII financial institutions established by the West.

4. Broader Geopolitical Context

WAICO is part of a systematic effort by Beijing—which includes the Global Development Initiative (GDI) and the Global Security Initiative (GSI)—to rewrite multilateralism and define the core rules of the 21st-century global order. The competition to set these AI standards is the new frontier of geopolitical power.


India's AI Governance Strategy: The Democratic Model for the AI Age 🇮🇳

India's approach to AI governance—built on the IndiaAI Mission and the Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) model—is a robust, democratic alternative to centralized initiatives like WAICO. The strategy aims to balance innovation with accountability and promote "AI for All," ensuring the technology is safe, trustworthy, and inclusive.

The governance framework employs a techno-legal, principle-based, and "light-touch" approach, prioritizing massive growth and social impact over overly restrictive regulation.


1. The IndiaAI Mission: The Foundational Strategy

This is the government's comprehensive plan to position India as a global leader in AI development, with a vision to democratize AI benefits across all sections of society.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi (Vision for India's AI) "AI must serve as an enabler for inclusive development across all strata of society, a vision of 'AI for All' to integrate scale with inclusion, sustainability and resilience." Context: This is the guiding philosophical principle behind the IndiaAI Mission and the DPI model, contrasting with state-centric or purely commercial AI models.

Seven Pillars of the IndiaAI Mission:

  • Compute Capacity: Creating a large, scalable AI computing ecosystem with over 10,000 GPUs via Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) to support startups and research.

  • Innovation Centre: Developing and deploying indigenous Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) and domain-specific foundational models for critical sectors.

  • Datasets Platform: Streamlining access to high-quality, non-personal datasets (AIKosh Platform) for research and training.

  • FutureSkills: Expanding AI education and training across academic levels to build India's talent pool.

  • Startup Financing: Providing streamlined access to funding and support for deep-tech AI startups and MSMEs.

  • Application Development: Promoting impactful AI solutions for large-scale socio-economic transformation (e.g., in healthcare, agriculture).

  • Safe & Trusted AI: Implementing the India AI Governance Guidelines to ensure ethical development, deploying indigenous tools for bias mitigation, and managing risks like deepfakes.

The mission is guided by seven "Sutras" of AI Governance, emphasizing "Innovation over Restraint," "People First," and "Fairness & Equity."

A Senior Official/Expert on AI (On the stakes of governance) "AI will determine not only who innovates but who defines what innovation means." Context: A potent summary of why controlling the standards (or "algorithms of power") is crucial—it's about defining the underlying economic and ethical values of the future.

2. Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI): The Deployment Model

DPI platforms (Aadhaar, UPI, DigiLocker) are India's contribution to global digital governance. Applied to AI, they fundamentally change the governance model by ensuring open access and scale.

DPI's Role in AI Governance:

  • Scale and Inclusion: DPI enables AI solutions (like multilingual LLMs) to reach over a billion people quickly and cheaply, ensuring services are accessible and equitable, avoiding the high costs of proprietary silos.

  • Data Governance (DEPA): The Data Empowerment and Protection Architecture (DEPA)—part of the DPI—ensures consent-based data sharing, giving individuals control and ownership over their data. This contrasts with models that risk centralizing data control under one authority.

  • Techno-Legal Approach: DPI embeds safety, privacy, and regulatory compliance into the infrastructure layer itself (e.g., secure authentication), enabling "compliance by design," which is more effective than external, top-down regulation.

  • Interoperability: The modular nature of DPI creates a non-monopolistic ecosystem ("UPI for AI" concept), simplifying model access and preventing vendor lock-in.


3. India's Global Stance

By championing DPI, India is offering the Global South a resilient, sovereign, and scalable alternative to both the restrictive regulatory approaches of the West and the centralization inherent in China's WAICO proposal. As the current Chair of the Global Partnership on AI (GPAI), India leads a multi-stakeholder body focused on responsible AI, ensuring its democratic, inclusive principles resonate globally.

—----------------

Source Material

Source References: Global AI Governance and India's Strategy 

1. Beijing's WAICO Push & Geopolitical Context

WAICO Proposal & Intent

  • Source: Official Chinese Government Announcements and Diplomatic Commentary.

  • Details: The initiative was formally proposed by President Xi Jinping. Context regarding the strategic shift and the Shanghai headquarters is provided by geopolitical analysts and former diplomatic experts.

Global South Appeal & Funding

  • Source: WAICO Action Plan / Global AI Governance Initiative (2023) documents.

  • Details: Refers to the proposals for an Algorithmic Compensation Fund and technology-sharing platforms, which are key elements used to attract developing nations.

Broader Multilateralism Context

  • Source: Chinese Policy Frameworks (GDI, GSI, GCI).

  • Details: Contextualizes WAICO as part of a larger, systemic effort to define global rules across security, development, and civilization initiatives.


2. India's AI Governance Strategy (IndiaAI Mission & DPI)

IndiaAI Mission (Structure & Budget)

  • Source: Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) and Press Information Bureau (PIB).

  • Details: Directly refers to the official Cabinet approval, budget outlay (₹10,371.92 crore), and the structure of the seven pillars (Compute, FutureSkills, etc.) as laid out in the Mission documents.

India AI Governance Guidelines

  • Source: MeitY Official Document on AI Governance.

  • Details: Contains the details on the "Seven Sutras" (Trust, People First, Innovation over Restraint) and the overall techno-legal, principle-based approach adopted by India.

Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) Model

  • Source: Strategic documents from NITI Aayog and MeitY, as well as reports from international organizations (e.g., World Bank, UNDP).

  • Details: Covers the concept of DPI (Aadhaar, UPI, DigiLocker) being the scalable and sovereign deployment model for AI services.

GPAI Chairmanship

  • Source: Press Information Bureau (PIB) official announcements.

  • Details: Refers to the official announcement regarding India taking over the Council Chair of the Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence (GPAI) in November 2022.


================


Comments


093242 28946

©2019 by Shrikant Soman. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page